Since the introduction of the Norms and Standards for School
Funding in 1998, the post-Apartheid government has made remarkable progress in
its pro-poor funding of education at the basic level. Education in poor
socioeconomic areas, such as rural areas, has been made accessible to children.
According to the Norms and Standards (1998) there are certain categories of
parents that are exempt from paying school fees based on their income levels.
From 2007, after the introduction of the Amended Norms and
Standards for School Funding, the government introduced a policy of “no fee”
schools. Initially the “no fee” school
policy referred to the poorest 40 percent (i.e. quintile 1 and 2) of public
primary and secondary schools in South Africa. In 2009 this “no fee” school
definition expanded to include the poorest 60 percent (i.e. quintile 1, 2 and
3) of public schools. These pro-poor funding policies have to a great extent
managed to broaden school access to the majority of poor children, especially
at the basic level of education. However, at the further education and training
band (i.e. Grade 10, 11 and 12) a significant number of children do not access
education due to the opportunity cost of education. Most of the parents in
rural areas are not aware of the existence of the school fee exemption policies
(Nelson Mandela Foundation, 2005).
The majority of the “no fee” schools are situated in poor
rural areas and Black townships, and in most instances these schools are poorly
resourced. However, some “no fee” schools do not comply with this policy as
they continue to charge fees of R100 and less. Principals of such schools claim
that the reason they charge fees is the failure of the provincial departments
in providing funds to schools in time. It is in these schools that the quality
of education is severely compromised, with children mainly doing English as a
second language. On the other hand, fee
paying schools in quintiles 4 and 5 are located in urban areas where resources
flourish. It is at these schools that the school fee exemption policy applies.
Furthermore, it is at these former Model C schools that mostly Black middle
class children, are taught “quality” education and learn English as a home
language in a majority of instances.
In January of every year when Grade 12 results are released,
South Africans are presented with the average pass percentages. What is hidden
in these average results is the fact that the majority of public schools in
rural areas and Black townships achieve very low results. Most of the children
in these areas fail to make it in Matric and a significant number of them drop
out of the school system, and as a result they join the ranks of the unskilled
labour force. In contrast, their counterparts from former Model C schools and
the few “lucky” ones from rural and Black township schools continue to tertiary
education and consequently become absorbed into the middle class.
Is it by commission or omission that more than eighteen
years, after political liberation, we are still confronted with a “divided”
education system where only a few benefit? Is the kind of schooling system that
we are pursuing really assisting in transforming our economy or is it a tool of
the capitalist class to perpetuate the current inequalities, poverty and
unemployment in order to maintain its hegemony?
I have to agree with everything in this post. Thanks for the
ReplyDeleteuseful information.
Improve Mileage
You are welcome King. Your comment is much appreciated.
Delete